Will ChatGPT make Quora obsolete?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:49
Let’s make things even more meta.
Alfred is Batman's butler, mentor, and moral compass. He provides emotional support, wisdom, and logistical help, acting as a human companion who ensures Bruce Wayne remains grounded. The relationship is deeply personal and rooted in trust and loyalty.
Well… No.
Utah’s quiet measles case: what happened and why officials stayed silent - KSLTV.com
A vizier obviously has more knowledge than the king. But it doesn’t make him more capable than the king. The vizier helps, but the king makes the call. Just like AI is more potent than a human, but it doesn’t make it the main element.
That’ll be done by bringing forth the historical term Amanuenses.
This analogy summarizes my point best:
Diddy’s lawyers won’t call witnesses after prosecution rests case - NBC News
Well… now we’ve put forth our chess move. That’s half of what it takes to win a debate.
I sent this PDF to my follower and asked her to use the same conclusion points to conclude her debate:
Tony Stark (Iron Man) has an AI moderator: Jarvis.
What if all of this is being written by an AI?
Generative AI is just autocorrect on steroids. To put it simply, its main job is to predict the next word. That’s it. Although it does that thing so brilliantly that it helps us create stuff, there’s no way it would make Quora or any other creative platform or job obsolete. It’ll just reduce the labor work that doesn’t require creativity. So, if your job is pure labor and doesn’t require you to be creative, AI will probably make it obsolete. It’s always better to switch to being creative. Not only would it be engaging and healthy for your brain, but you also wouldn’t feel threatened to lose your job.
Examples:
Watch an asteroid the size of an aircraft carrier make a close pass of Earth on June 5 - Space
That’s by using AI to win the debate defending AI.
Meta-X = X about X
Another great historical reference would be that of Viziers.
How do you cope when your mother doesn't love you?
Now, you’re about to experience a little heist we pulled.
ChatGPT is like Dr. Watson to Sherlock Holmes. Alfred to Batman. There’s even a software called Alfred for Mac systems. I personally use it. There’s a reason why it was named Alfred. It proves that in this modern world, you don’t need to be a billionaire like Bruce Wayne to have your personal butler.
So the crazy little idea was to make the debate Meta.
Is anal sex allowed in Islam? It's not written anywhere in the Quran whether it's forbidden or not.
What if this answer itself was written by ChatGPT? What if I trained ChatGPT on all of my Quora answers and taught it my language, tone, and way of writing?
Or is it?
ChatGPT will not make Quora (or any other platform) obsolete.
Viziers:
So this answer was not written using AI.
In ancient kingdoms, viziers were senior advisors to the king or emperor. They handled state affairs, offered counsel, and executed the ruler’s directives, much like a modern-day chief of staff.
Now it was up to her to perform well in the debate.
Amanuenses: Many famous writers employed assistants responsible for taking dictation or copying manuscripts. For example, John Milton, who was blind, dictated his epic poem Paradise Lost to amanuenses, including his daughters.
Meta-Discussion = Discussion about Discussion
Famous 'ice-age puppies' are not actually dogs, according to new study - Earth.com
A sort of Meta-AI thing.
I collected every point I had discussed with her in Instagram DMs and fed those points to ChatGPT, asking it to lead them to a final conclusion. Furthermore, I asked it to create a PDF of the conclusion points and send it to me.
The other half? — It’s to counter the chess move put forward by the opponents.
Large Bluetooth speaker with style and power - Marshall Tufton in a practical test - Notebookcheck
So, basically, for her to win the debate competition, she would need to prove that AI (tools like ChatGPT) does not hinder the art of creative thinking in humans.
Even if the greatest novel writers didn’t have ChatGPT back then, they did have somebody special around them who sparked ideas like a catalyst in a chemical reaction. But today, we don’t need to rely on another human for that. We can rely on Generative AI.
Post Credits:
Diabetes drug shows benefits for patients with liver disease - Medical Xpress
A couple of months ago, I received these texts from one of my followers on Instagram:
Meta-Joke = A Joke about Jokes
Alfred supports Batman on a personal and ethical level, whereas Jarvis is more of a technical and operational assistant for Iron Man.
Gaza-bound aid boat with Greta Thunberg on board arrives in Israel after its seizure - PBS
There’s an effective way to trap the opponents—by using our attacking argument as the defending argument—the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools. Using the same attacking and defending argument will trap the opponents by rendering them off of any additional points to counter.
Calm down. It’s Sunny this side.
The next day, I received her text:
Or was it?
This is what she replied with:
So I replied to her texts with this:
I was already occupied with a lot of work, but I had this crazy little idea that made me throw away everything else and glue myself to this moment.
Or am I?
The legendary works published by writers throughout history were crafted with the help of assistants. It’s just that AI solves the problem of hiring human assistants. Now we can have our own assistants for free (or for tiny subscription, coz… capitalism).
Jarvis (Just A Rather Very Intelligent System) is an artificial intelligence that assists Tony Stark (Iron Man) with a wide range of tasks, from managing his suits to offering tactical advice. Jarvis represents advanced technology, providing efficient, data-driven assistance without emotional nuance.
It’s by showing the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools like ChatGPT. Tools like these cannot think for you. You have to do the thinking. Then communicate with these tools. Then the tools will behave like your assistants.
Although, this level of comparison isn’t totally valid right now because what we are dealing with currently is Generative Artificial Intelligence and not Artificial General Intelligence. There’s way more to go for us to reach that level.
I can’t explain the joy that ran through my nerves seeing we were able to pull off such a heist.
Bruce Wayne (Batman) has a human moderator: Alfred.
Sunny Dhondkar
Now, concluding my answer to your question:
I would never use AI to write a Quora answer. I’ve got a different kind of attachment with Quora. Quora was the first platform I started creating content on. I’ve got a special corner for the people on Quora who have been reading my answers.
The thing is, ChatGPT existed in history—but in human form. People were creative back then because of a moderator in human form. Today, we don’t need a human moderator. Creativity will be maintained in the same way.
Alright.
Well, well, well.
I totally disappeared from the face of Quora more than a year ago. And I reappear abruptly, out of thin air, talking about AI. Uncanny, isn’t it?
But how does this meta-fication prove our point?
Nah, I’m just kidding.
That’s it. There isn’t much of a significant difference. Both superheroes work at the same creative level.
Is this AI as Sunny? Or Sunny as AI? Or just AI?
As you will see, this crazy little idea would help her win this debate competition against 20 other teams (even though she had less than 12 hours to prepare) and will also answer your question. So stay with me.
I’m coming for you, humans.
Meta-Learning = Learning about Learning
Just like Alexander the Great being tutored by Aristotle.
So, I asked her to roughly formulate what the potential moves of her opponents might be.
To achieve feats that are greater than us, we need a greater level of assistance.
Hahaha.
Before we proceed, you should be aware of the prefix Meta.